Recently i read an argument for infant baptism which related Collossians 2:11&12 as being the New Testament connection between circumcision and infant baptism:
In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.Yes i know both are mentioned but i just don't see it as saying circumcision is now changed to sprinkling your babies...
(Colossians 2:11-12 ESV)
... in fact i see it plainly as being a passage to the redeemed - those who have been "raised with Him through faith in the powerful working of God" and not as a covenant that by baptism we receive some promise of children being saved.
Or maybe that's my baptist goggles speaking.
What's your take?