A rambling blog by a Christian in Northern Ireland
About Boaly
Gary has been involved in printing the Scriptures for 20 years, enjoys photography and rambling online
In thinking of this I was contemplating the nature of poetry. I fully believe that the Bible is the authoritive Word of God and speaks directly to us. When It says "do not commit adultery" it means just that, but in thinking of the Song of Solomon and its poetic nature I thought that perhaps as with a lot of poetry, though it holds a core truth and teaches many definites that in passages such as this it may be open to imaginative response by the reader and so hold different aspects for the reader?
Still hoping to hear from someone with a clue as to the author's original intent. However, can we surmise Driscoll's intent?
I think it means both. It means protection and safety under the protection of the man, but it also has another meaning which is oral sex that she is giving him oral pleasure.
As far as I can tell it means both. What is the act motivated by?
No woman should fee she has to get down on her knees and please the man as a forced obligation.
Married sex should be a pleasurable act of giving to the other person.
A woman who is scared her husband will withhold love, hurt her etc. if she does not give oral sex to her husband would not match well with the Shulamite in this passage.
She felt safe, loved and cared for and if the passage is referring to oral sex (and it seems like a possible interpretation as near the end she is compared to a palm tree and grabbing clusters is the same as breasts so can not the same logic be to the man?) then the act should be marked by mutual consent and driven by love both seeking the best interest of the other.
If she has a conscience issue or if she desires to perform it and the husband does then it should be abstained from and prayed through.
Since there is no clear prohibition in Scripture (and I feel if God viewed it as detestable He would tell us to save so many marriages) we can only take biblical principles.
Some peoples conscience won't see oral sex anywhere in song of solomon but some do and you can read it with that in mind or without and I think that was the Holy Spirits intent.
Obviously its a sexual book (let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth as verse 1...) however it is written in such a way that it is not explicitly clear what they are doing but the two of them are fully aware what the pomegranates are etc.
Kind of like a married couple saying,
"Dinner at Claire's tonight?"
But really their backyard pool is nicknamed Claire.
So are they having dinner?
Possibly, there is a Claire's nearby and they frequent it but why did the wife have a playful smile?
To them making love in the pool is hinted at, however to yoy and I as outside observers, unless we know the pool is also named Claire's we will think restaurant.
This I feel is the ambiguity intended in Solomon and I feel both interpretations could be correct.
Palm tree and breasts.
Apple tree is a little harder but possibly.
When we come into marriage we are harmed by sin. Not everyone is ready for everything.
If you are unsure about oral sex ask God for wisdom and ask the Holy Spirit to lead you.
Some eat vegetables some don't.
If the Lord uses your conscience to drive yoy from eating vegetables then listen.
If the Lord does not conflict, well.
Thats between you, your spouse and the Lord.
Neither of us live to ourselves or die to ourselves but whether we live or die we are the Lords.
Hope this helps.
Created with by OmTemplates | Distributed by GooyaabiTemplates